Extinction Culture

I find that a lot of "collapseniks" are playing a numbers game when it comes to timelines, like Russian roulette. Their intentions sociopolitically may be good, especially if they are just your average civilian, but they do not typically see the whole picture with Ascension. So there is a lot of grieving on that end. People are grieving what used to be, their past illusory sense of global ecological and financial "stability". This fits relatively the mechanism of creating a solution for an engineered problem. 

Manifesting a bad timeline means nothing to those people, aware or not. Some want the world to burn, and there are also pro-extinction (human extinction) groups and movements which I refuse to support. Ascension is the polar opposite of Pro-extinction Ideology. Collapse is not necessarily intertwined or related directly to the pro-extinction culture.

This is why I often think and have said before that obsessing over human extinction worries and beliefs is a bait that makes people manifest descending timelines. So my question is, is there a current dichotomy where you have to either support the Ascension, or believe that humanity should perish away with the excuse of benefitting Mother Nature since "humans" are the ones destroying her work? I don't think she wants us all gone, personally. If you truly subscribe to "everybody dies", then sadly your ideology won't matter once we're all gone because we will all be elsewhere/dead.

If you don't subscribe to the whole Ascension thing but don't want extinction to happen, and still want a better future for humanity, there is such a thing as Solarpunk and similar groups/movements. Which I lurk there and honestly I am starting to be more involved with a "solarpunk" group.

Unification of people at the cost of decentralization of resources.